<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Guardrails on BlueSquadron — Security engineering for AI systems</title><link>https://bluesquadron.dev/tags/guardrails/</link><description>Recent content in Guardrails on BlueSquadron — Security engineering for AI systems</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><managingEditor>florent.batard@gmail.com (Florent Batard)</managingEditor><webMaster>florent.batard@gmail.com (Florent Batard)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bluesquadron.dev/tags/guardrails/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Securing AI-DLC: Process Integrity Is Not Product Security</title><link>https://bluesquadron.dev/posts/securing-the-ai-driven-development-lifecycle/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>florent.batard@gmail.com (Florent Batard)</author><guid>https://bluesquadron.dev/posts/securing-the-ai-driven-development-lifecycle/</guid><description>AI-DLC gives you the strongest process integrity I have seen in any methodology — approval gates, audit shards, element-level traceability. None of it tells you the code is safe. Those are different claims, and closing the gap phase by phase is the work.</description></item><item><title>The Security Coach for AI Agents</title><link>https://bluesquadron.dev/posts/security-coach-for-ai-agents/</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>florent.batard@gmail.com (Florent Batard)</author><guid>https://bluesquadron.dev/posts/security-coach-for-ai-agents/</guid><description>Every team debating whether to trust the model has already made the decision that matters: where the boundary lives. A prompt is a promise. A tool interface is a constraint. Four patterns for telling them apart.</description></item></channel></rss>